CashFlow

Must say I reacted to when i read "can't put people in contact with his lawyer because he was advised not to say anything to anyone... "

hm...


yes Schminner seem to be omnipotence involved here "Admin believed that his honest and pristine reputation will bail him out of this possible scam of his"

__________________
Keep your self clean and clear, you are the window through which you must see the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
write as your reference: CashFlow
My page about
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Jude

Still waiting for my solicitor to reply. That was the message I got from PeterB as well, on being discrete and all.

I'll just see what we can do.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Be Good!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Propellertop

I've only been following things from afar seeing as others have been carrying the ball with regard to speculating but what's the point at the moment? Wouldn't it be more prudent to give PeterB a chance to 'make it back'? Perhaps a fixed time frame before action? What constructive options do you believe we have?

kibitzer

I'm sorry, but TRADE IT BACK? We don't even know, in the glaring absence of evidence (for instance, trading records) that he was doing well as a trader. Except for some cherry-picked screenshots, he has denied Jude his request for access to any kind of verifiable trading transactions.

And talk about ridiculous! Someone was insinuating at GT that maybe one of the most vocal critics was perhaps the HACKER himself. Excuse me, did I hear that right??? The accuser, by some twist of logic, has become the accused!!! Jeez.

Conciliator

No, I think it's more prudent to demand that he stop acting like a fucktard and start providing some simple evidence for the loss. How can we plan on him 'making it back' if we haven't even established that he's not the one who stole it? His actions are beyond belief for me.

opie999

Proptop! Most excellent to have you with us on NN!

Rational speculation can serve a purpose. Besides blowing off steam and maybe relieving a little stress, it helps as a means of bouncing ideas off others in a similar predicament as your own. It can help in seeing things from a different perspective or in a context you wouldn't have otherwise seen on your own. This can aid in organizing your thoughts to generate new ideas and strategies. Call it conjectural brainstorming.

Everyone in the program would love nothing more than to have PeterB "make it back". To recover our lost funds. What's unclear is whether he intends to "make it back". None of us knows for certain. Until PeterB proves he's being straight with us, doesn't it make sense to at least prepare the groundwork for legal action?

I'm hoping this would accomplish at least two things. First, provide an incentive for PeterB to carry through with a full and honest recovery. Second, have the machinery in place and ready to go into immediate action in the unlikely event he attempts to bolt.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

opie999

Ahoy, peterg!

Yes, I suppose it is about time you got here, you ol' sea dog! LOL! Welcome aboard, mate.
Sums it up quite nicely for me too. Thank you, Sir!

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Conciliator

Why in the world am I now banned over at GT? Is Jambutty getting trigger happy over there? I know he doesn't like me... probaby has been looking for something that he can stretch as justification for banning me.

This is ridiculous.

Conciliator

No kidding... now of a sudden all the people demanding answers ARE the hacker? HAHAHA... these people are Peter's little puppets. Interesting how some have so few posts... like it could be Peter himself.

opie999

Hey guys, probably not a biggie, but for the sake of accuracy, he never said that.

Just keepin' the high ground.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.