Quote:
Originally Posted by snuffkin
Hi!
First, there is no way that the UK police could know for sure that WC was a scam. No one has been convicted of a crime yet, they have only just started an investigation. The finnish police haven't commented on the issue much and I'm sure that both countries would be informed at the same time. So it's either an investigation technique or the story got twisted somewhere.
I don't know what is going on right now, but I can't understand how WC could have been a scam either. There is no way that it could have been a pyramid, one that was funded only by the money that people brought in. Here's why.
- Everyone I know that has invested in the club has got their money back and more, and only a fraction of them have sponsored more people.
-The signals that the software gave out were real, you can ask anyone who used fxtrader signals in their trading - they were able to make profit using the software. Why would you NOT trade if you were so good at it?? I mean... it makes no sense!
- The information in the media contradicts itself. If there are 50 WC people living in Thailand, and people put 50 million in the club, that makes 1 million per person in the thai community - which is not a lot of money. Plus the rest of the money that thousands of other people have taken out. More money must have come from somewhere. It is simply NOT ENOUGH.
-This club has been going and developing since 2003. It has been closed from new members for months and months, while people took out money. So at some point you start wondering... if this was a ponzi scheme, why would they close it from incoming funds for so long?? There was a voting, if people would want to open the club for new members or keep it closed. Again, doesn't make sense.
-All kinds of marketing and advertising of this community has been against the rules. If it was a pyramid/ponzi, I don't understand why marketing would be prohibited.
Again, I do not understand what is going on. I think that it may be something very unfortunate and strange, something we have no idea about.
Now that the police is involved, it may be a long while before things get back to normal. Even if the website was brought back up, our money traffick would be jammed - thanks to people going to the police.
Well, everyone have a great day! I guess only time will tell us what the truth is. Even if this was a scam, I'm more than interested to see how this all happened. I consider myself a sensible person, and I know for a fact that the people involved with this club are highly respected, intelligent and powerful individuals in their communities. You people would be surprised.
|
Hi
I cannot argue with any of the things you have referred to,in fact many of these were what convinced me to invest my money in the first place and I have many doubts about what is actually happening.
I take your point about the fact that there is very little information given out by Finnish police and yet UK police were very forthcoming about being convinced that WC was a scam,maybe thats because there is no likelihood of media explosion in UK like there is in Finland and maybe also in UK police are very much more direct.
For example when I asked Moneybookers why my account was frozen they gave me phone number of Finnish police officer whom I spoke to but because of the language difficulty I did not get much information.
The day after I received a call from a UK officer from the Fraud Squad in London who asked me how much I had invested and for the contact details of those I had sponsored.I replied I was not happy for him to contact them before I had told them of the situation and that I would contact them all and ask them to contact him .
The next day he called me and said he had not had any contact from anyone and I said I would contact my sponsored persons again and ask them again but he demanded contact details there and then.
I was out of town and could not access all the details instantly at which point he said if I did not give him the information right now he would send a local police officer to my house and they would take me the 200 miles to London charged with fraud.
I pointed out that I was not at home and he was therefore wasting his time so in the end he agreed I could send him details when I got home but I was not impressed with the threats.
But back to Wincapita,whilst accepting all your points I would like to play the devils advocate and put forward some things which would support the scam theory.
I think that some events in the past could represent a perfect exit strategy from a scam.
For example lets say you have a programme which is going along ok,attracting new investment and paying out ok and you decide to livenh things up,given the fact that that you are able to analyse the way people invest and withdraw and have been able to build up a model of how people behave over a number of years.
So firstly you suddenly make it impossible for members to sign up new people supposedly because of media attention and to prove your business is not a ponzi but in reality senior members can still make "special requests"from upline to sign new members.New members do not really sign up many new people or attract new investment until they have been a member for a while anyway so the incoming cash does not suffer too much as the "back door members" keep arriving,in fact now the club is closed people who have been sitting on the fence for a while are even keener to join as they feel it more exclusive.
Next up you have in November the best months trading ever.over 400 pips,everythings going great and then there is a Christmas party where eveyone has a great time and is attended by senior members but not club management.
A poll in the forum reveals over 70% of the members would prefer to maintain the ban on new members and admin remind members that the club is not a democracy and will act as it sees the best interests of the club.
December results are once again outstanding and by now everyone in the club is dreaming of a white Christmas.
By now everyone is convinced that this is fantastic so when the club reopens for new memberships in early January there is a massive frantic demand which has built up whilst membership has been closed other than to those on the inside track.
Now the rules for new members are that to qualify for the original rights new members must join before 14th January.It is virtually impossible for new members to open a moneybookers account,get it verified and then fund the account and send money to WC in time.So existing members can use funds in Wincapita to pay for new members which is a masterstroke as it keeps huge amounts of money in the club which otherwise might have been taken out.
WIF shares are announced with the prospectus showing the fantastic anticipated returns and the fact that shares cost 3 euros in January,6 euros in February and 9 euros in March so if you buy in January you can treble your money by April.
Just to give a liitle credence to the fledgeling WIF organisation there are advertisments in the forum for officers to work for the company.
January trading results are great again members buy lots of WIF shares instead of withdrawing funds and then new members repay their sponsors having opened their MB accounts and done transfers.
So there is another big influx of cash into the system buying WIF shares at bargain prices and the result is a massive cash bubble in Wincapita
In February trading results start to look very much less impressive,members complain on the forum and then the forum is withdrawn so members can not withdraw.
Then we had the announcement about abuse of the club and the rest is history.
I have never been able to explain how the club could exist as long as it did if there was no legitimate trading.Maybe there was some balance between incoming money in new investments and outgoing which could maintain a stable situation and I am sure that the 6 month time differential between investing and withdrawing would help with that and the club management would be able to monitor this closely.
Maybe there was some trading and whether or not it was as successful as it was conveyed to members we do not know.
But if we accept the events as an exit strategy then it stands as a really effective model.
I have no doubt about your comments on the people involved in the network,I am sure that the vast majority of people involved in this are decent and honest but there has been a cloud cast over the intentions of those at the top which only they can lift or maybe the authorities will disperse