Nobullshit Network Forum at View Single Post

Andy · 07-05-2007, 10:16 AM

Hmmm I have to prove it is not a scam. Well I would have thought it extremely obvious that the payment processor fees would go towards generating returns. What I am doing is working with some people outside of the autosurf industry because the payment processor provides the things that people are looking for. That is security and privacy.

Longfella I urge you to revisit the processor, as I think you will find it offers more security than you may think.

Re my integrity, it seems to me that opinion of what integrity is varies. Now I am not going to deny that I made some bloody huge mistakes. However, I have not turned my back on anyone. I have gone back to drawing boards and worked on the model that was successful, and the time is right to launch it again. Integrity is not all about "If admin pays they have integrity if they do not then they do not"

Aditionally, every payment processr up until now has given the administrator of that payment processor access to all the funds that come in. Every payment processor, up until this model, has given the adminsitrator access to the members accounts. Every payment processor up to this model as allowed the potential for the administrator to provide details about the members and their funds to anyone they so desire.

This model does not give the admin access to the funds so that they can vanish (a la osgold evocash etc). This moel does not have accounts, therefore your funds cannot be identified. There is no history kept.

In a day when your every e-gold transaction is currently being reviewe by the government, this system provides you privacy within the system.

Couple to that a model to that that has worked effectively for over 12 months and only failed because the new owner did not support it, and I think you have a viable and strong program.

I think, btw that the labelling of a program as a scam, which you all appear so ready to do if you do not get paid, completely ignores that there is a risk in the arena. It is not zero sum, and to pretend that it is and if you do not get pai then it has to be a scam is completely off base. This comment relates to your categorization of any program, not just mine.

Label this high risk if you like. But to put anything in a scam section is to shortchange yourselves and your readers.

07-05-2007, 10:16 AM	#21 (permalink)
Andy Junior Crapper Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 35 Thanks: 1 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Re: XLOTwo Hmmm I have to prove it is not a scam. Well I would have thought it extremely obvious that the payment processor fees would go towards generating returns. What I am doing is working with some people outside of the autosurf industry because the payment processor provides the things that people are looking for. That is security and privacy. Longfella I urge you to revisit the processor, as I think you will find it offers more security than you may think. Re my integrity, it seems to me that opinion of what integrity is varies. Now I am not going to deny that I made some bloody huge mistakes. However, I have not turned my back on anyone. I have gone back to drawing boards and worked on the model that was successful, and the time is right to launch it again. Integrity is not all about "If admin pays they have integrity if they do not then they do not" Aditionally, every payment processr up until now has given the administrator of that payment processor access to all the funds that come in. Every payment processor, up until this model, has given the adminsitrator access to the members accounts. Every payment processor up to this model as allowed the potential for the administrator to provide details about the members and their funds to anyone they so desire. This model does not give the admin access to the funds so that they can vanish (a la osgold evocash etc). This moel does not have accounts, therefore your funds cannot be identified. There is no history kept. In a day when your every e-gold transaction is currently being reviewe by the government, this system provides you privacy within the system. Couple to that a model to that that has worked effectively for over 12 months and only failed because the new owner did not support it, and I think you have a viable and strong program. I think, btw that the labelling of a program as a scam, which you all appear so ready to do if you do not get paid, completely ignores that there is a risk in the arena. It is not zero sum, and to pretend that it is and if you do not get pai then it has to be a scam is completely off base. This comment relates to your categorization of any program, not just mine. Label this high risk if you like. But to put anything in a scam section is to shortchange yourselves and your readers.

Sponsored Links